nanogui: a question about flnx on framebuffer


Previous by date: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, John Zulauf
Next by date: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, John Zulauf
Next in thread: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Holden

Subject: RE: Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10105010910160.1654-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org>

On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, John Zulauf wrote:
> Touchscreen too?

I'll start off by writing drivers for the pointing devices that I actually
own and want to be able to use with Nano-X. Ie. PS/2 three button, PS/2
IntelliMouse with wheel (actually a Logitech trackball), serial MS
protocol two button, USB, Mac ADB, possibly Acorn (if I can get it to boot
a recent version of Linux), possibly SUN (if I can find or improvise an
optical mouse pad for it). I'll probably also implement some way to allow
multiple drivers to be compiled in and selected at run time (all optional
at build time of course). For something like a touchscreen that doesn't
already have a GPM driver (as in the Ipaq) I see no good reason not to
write a native Nano-X driver for it.

> (hello Alex, how's your last term treating you)

Not too bad, I'm just trying to get my final year project working...

-- 
------- Alex Holden -------
http://www.linuxhacker.org/
 http://www.robogeeks.org/


Previous by date: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, John Zulauf
Next by date: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, John Zulauf
Next in thread: 1 May 2001 08:29:49 -0000 Re: a question about flnx on framebuffer, Alex Holden


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.