nanogui: GTK+ port to nano-X


Previous by date: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Next by date: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 VNC Server, Alex Pavloff
Previous in thread: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Next in thread: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Paolo Molaro

Subject: RE: GTK+ port to nano-X
From: "Gray, Tim" ####@####.####
Date: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000
Message-Id: <AB6EA0602143D51192DD00508BCF8B8F3311A3@entcoexch03.tci.com>

I remember a long time ago that perl was being scaled down,  microperl or
nanoperl...  I don't remember.
If the language could be squeezed down to only twice the size of
microwindows it could be viable.

Just my 2 Cents.



-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:29 PM
To: ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Subject: Re: GTK+ port to nano-X


> With all that in place if you want to add a "Super Soak" cycle to the 
> washing machines, then whamo send the washing machine a new XML 
> script with the "Super Soak" button added, and a new Python script 
> with the OnSuperSoak() function defined.
> 
> Now that's a bitchin use for XML and Python in an embedded nano-X 
> device.

Python is way too big. In fact for small embedded devices I'd problem even
be tokenising the XML to avoid having to go <> parsing 8)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####



Previous by date: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Next by date: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 VNC Server, Alex Pavloff
Previous in thread: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Gary James
Next in thread: 17 May 2001 19:47:30 -0000 Re: GTK+ port to nano-X, Paolo Molaro


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.