nanogui: PeekMessage and other questions


Previous by date: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: question about frambuffer, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: graphic manipulation speed is too slow, ouypp.legend.com
Previous in thread: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: PeekMessage and other questions, Sunil Soman
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] PeekMessage and other questions
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000
Message-Id: <005901c0eabf$5300fa40$3aba46a6@xmission.com>

: It occurs to me that using an OS such as eCos, where we would replace 
: processes with threads anyway, the marshalling wouldn't be required, though 
: we would need to protect the WIN32 API adequately from unwanted reentry. 

There's still the problem that SendMessage() has to execute in the
context of the receiving thread in it's WndProc(), but it might not
be that bad, since all addresses would remain valid.

Regards,

Greg



Previous by date: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: question about frambuffer, Jordan Crouse
Next by date: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: graphic manipulation speed is too slow, ouypp.legend.com
Previous in thread: 1 Jun 2001 18:36:40 -0000 Re: PeekMessage and other questions, Sunil Soman
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.