nanogui: about nanox/client.1 and nanox/clien.2


Previous by date: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: Simulator wiht nanox, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: Can the framebuffer driver be set up for Intel 810 chipset ., Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: about nanox/client.1 and nanox/clien.2, Alex Holden
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] about nanox/client.1 and nanox/clien.2
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000
Message-Id: <00f101c116d8$c0394410$6817dbd0@censoft.com>

: > What's the purpose of client.1 and client.2 ?

Yes, Gary and Alex are right, they're figments of an earlier
implementation.  I'll remove them in the CVS version.

Whenever I make major changes in an implementation that
may cause the system to fail catastrophically, I typically
save the earlier version in a .1 file.  This is only so that I can
quickly diff the results should the system fail so that it can
quickly be brought back up to an earlier implementation.
These files were created when I add the client-side event
queuing, but it seems that it works!

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: Simulator wiht nanox, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: Can the framebuffer driver be set up for Intel 810 chipset ., Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 27 Jul 2001 20:05:48 -0000 Re: about nanox/client.1 and nanox/clien.2, Alex Holden
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.