nanogui: Antwort: Micro-Windows version 0.82
Subject:
RE: Antwort: Micro-Windows version 0.82
From:
Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date:
29 Jun 1999 17:06:58 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9906291756560.5867-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Greg Haerr wrote:
> : Or can I still use your nano-X tree to develop my nano-Toolkit ?
> I would suggest that you use my tree, because Alex says his
> is not compiling at the moment. I'll send Alex anything I add for nano-X.
I think the user API is currently the same in mine and Greg's, so a
user space toolkit should work with both. The only problem I can see is
that you'll have to compile the toolkit into the server along with the
application and can still only use one application at a time (my code
doesn't solve that yet either), plus you'll only have an 8bpp framebuffer
driver (I think my code solves that problem). If you're porting it to GGI
that doesn't really matter anyway though. I don't think things have
changed that much internally that porting the driver back to my code after
getting it working on Greg's should be much more than changing the name of
the file and the headers it references.
--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------
