nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next by date: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Stuart Hughes
Previous in thread: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Stuart Hughes

Subject: Re: Licensing
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000
Message-Id: <E1101GS-0001Bf-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> * Go with LGPL, accept the limitations it would impose on the way we code
> (defined APIs between the proprietory and non proprietory code, etc.), and
> hope that nobody notices that the license doesn't make any sense for our
> use of it.

Well lets face it the only compiled into the application situation we are
likely to have is Linux 8086. That is a known hotbed of proprietary commercial
software 8)

Everyone else uses it client/server so its not a big deal - except maybe boot
disks, and if Debian or RH use it instead of Bogl alone it will be with GPL'd
installers so a non issue

Alan


Previous by date: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next by date: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Stuart Hughes
Previous in thread: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 2 Jul 1999 11:21:32 -0000 Re: Licensing, Stuart Hughes


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.