nanogui: Licensing


Previous by date: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next by date: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Darran D. Rimron
Previous in thread: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Darran D. Rimron

Subject: Re: Licensing
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9907021346470.18188-100000@www.linuxhacker.org>

On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> Well lets face it the only compiled into the application situation we are
> likely to have is Linux 8086. That is a known hotbed of proprietary commercial
> software 8)

Nano-X could well become useful in small embedded systems (ones that are
too small to run something like Linux but still have a GUI, like
photocopiers). The "there is only one process" model is still quite common
in such systems.

--------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. --------------
: Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham :
-------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ --------------------


Previous by date: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next by date: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Darran D. Rimron
Previous in thread: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 2 Jul 1999 12:50:06 -0000 Re: Licensing, Darran D. Rimron


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.