nanogui: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculation


Previous by date: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: nano-x questions, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood
Previous in thread: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood
Next in thread: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculation
From: Jordan Crouse ####@####.####
Date: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000
Message-Id: <E16TPb4-0004dV-00@ns.censoft.com>

I have watched Microwindows successfully run on x86, arm, mips and powerpc. 
At this point, anything that runs a linux kernel with a framebuffer can 
successfully run Microwindows.

Jordan

On Tuesday 22 January 2002 21:13, Darran D. Rimron-Molloy mentioned:
> Has anyone tried Microwindows on the framebuffer of any other Linux arch
> (Solaris, PPC, etc)
>
> Just wondering if it worked or not? :)
>
> Actually, as a bypoint - do we have an authorative list of platforms we
> have run nanoX on, both historic and current (ie, does it still actually
> run on DOS and ELKS?)
>
> I would be happy to maintain such a monster, database and webpage it,
> including features such as caveats, todo's, etc....
>
> 	-Darran
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####

Previous by date: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: nano-x questions, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood
Previous in thread: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood
Next in thread: 23 Jan 2002 15:49:12 -0000 Re: Completely un-urgent and almost off-topic speculati on, Simon Wood


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.