nanogui: microwindows
Subject:
Re: microwindows
From:
"Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date:
17 Apr 2002 21:41:42 -0000
Message-Id: <20020417114444.B7772@aaron.internal>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 12:19:21PM +0100, Simon Wood wrote:
> If you are wanting Nano-X, but don't have the networkstack you can
> specify to link the Nano-X server into the application. This produces
> a combined application in the same manner as the Microwindows stuff,
> but also means you can have only one application running at time.
I have a brute-force lock-all-nano-X-calls wrapper that lets multiple
RTEMS tasks use nano-X; I'd be happy to share if anybody's interested.
(my co-worker wrote it before he left...) it's brute-force-inelegance at
its best, but it does the job.
ideally all nano-X calls would be re-entrant (and correspondingly
threadsafe), but that would be quite an undertaking.
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.####
