nanogui: Microwindows for Hercules


Previous by date: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Chipzz
Next by date: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Chipzz
Next in thread: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Greg Haerr

Subject: RE: Microwindows for Hercules
From: Chipzz ####@####.####
Date: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907161849170.11098-100000@ace.ulyssis.student.kuleuven.ac.be>

> 	No need.  MicroWindows handles the Bresenham algorithm in the mid
> level code in devdraw.c.  It uses successive calls to drawpixel to make it work.

Hmm. A 8086 isn't quite a PC on which you want to loose performance. And
that's exactly what you're doing here. PutPixel is a short routine and you
loose way to much time if you don't inline it...

> In this way, people like you and me don't have to rewrite bresenham for every
> card someone wants....

You wouldn't have to rewrite it for every -CARD-, you would have to re-
write it for every BIT-DEPTH. Which isn't that much work anyway.

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                  ####@####.####
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Previous by date: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Chipzz
Next by date: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Chipzz
Next in thread: 16 Jul 1999 16:59:08 -0000 Re: Microwindows for Hercules, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.