nanogui: Nano Gui and XWindows


Previous by date: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 Nxzilla help, Monah Baki
Next by date: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 NanoX performance, yuanpeng wang
Previous in thread: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 Nano Gui and XWindows, Nguyen The Luan
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Nano Gui and XWindows
From: George Goh ####@####.####
Date: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100
Message-Id: <1080547238.3272.13.camel@LinuxDev2>

Hi,

Please refer to the faq on the microwindows site for your first
question.

In your second question, I believe you are referring to nano-X, and
whether it requires X windows to operate (Please correct me if I'm
wrong). I think the answer is, it depends. 

Typically, nano-X is run on top of the linux framebuffer, as a
small-footprint replacement for X Windows. Also, (although I haven't
tried this), nano-X can be run directly on hardware.

There is also the facility of running nano-X on top of X windows.
Although this seems to defeat the purpose of using nano-X in the first
place, it is useful for testing on a development host in an X Windows
environment.

Hope this helps,
George Goh

On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 03:55, Nguyen The Luan wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> I wonder that
> NanoGui is based on Xwindows or not?
> And can we run NanoGui without supporting of Xwindows
> 
>  Best Regard
> Nguyen


Previous by date: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 Nxzilla help, Monah Baki
Next by date: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 NanoX performance, yuanpeng wang
Previous in thread: 29 Mar 2004 09:00:51 +0100 Nano Gui and XWindows, Nguyen The Luan
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.