nanogui: NanoGUI palette model


Previous by date: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 new version of nano-X/microwindows, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Timo Ketola

Subject: Re: NanoGUI palette model
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000
Message-Id: <E11X6oR-0004ha-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> come, but I'm trying to hold back on the urge to make this big.  It's also
> slower, and most cases can be handled at mid-level.  After all, we're talking
> about pretty simple code here. Another way of thinking of it is I'm trying
> to keep the driver-duplicated code to a minimum, that's what the midlevel is
> for.

There is a subtle and important semantic you want to keep if you want stuff
to continue to work well for a long time.

Top level calls driver. Driver calls midlevel as a library.

Doing it that way means a smart driver or a plain weird one can opt out of
midlevel policy.

Alan


Previous by date: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 new version of nano-X/microwindows, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 1 Oct 1999 17:59:26 -0000 Re: NanoGUI palette model, Timo Ketola


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.