nanogui: Which way to go on?


Previous by date: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 Re: cross compiling microwindows, tj
Next by date: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 "ELKS" is not defined in winuser.h ?, yidrissi.konplan.com
Previous in thread: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 Re: Which way to go on?, Alan Cox
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Which way to go on?
From: "Da'niel Csabai" ####@####.####
Date: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100
Message-Id: <40976311.3010204@freemail.hu>

Hello Áron,

I do not know your board, but if you use room fs image which is loaded 
from the flash to your board's ram,
let check the supports of your bootloader. Maybe it supports gzipped 
room fs. With this way you can save much more place.
At the moment we have the image file with around 2,9Mb with all stuff & 
control program.


Regards,
Dániel

Alan Cox írta:

>You definitely want to be using dynamic linking, and if your platform
>supports it PIC code. That way not only will the library only be on
>flash once but it will only be in memory once.
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
>
>
>  
>



Previous by date: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 Re: cross compiling microwindows, tj
Next by date: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 "ELKS" is not defined in winuser.h ?, yidrissi.konplan.com
Previous in thread: 4 May 2004 10:29:05 +0100 Re: Which way to go on?, Alan Cox
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.