nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000
Message-Id: <032101bf0ea2$757cfec0$b8119526@ltc.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
To: Bradley D. LaRonde ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows


> On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> > This is an idea, but why?  Doesn't MPL completely kill any GPL benefit?
Why
> > would someone choose to use it under GPL when they can use it under MPL?
>
> Because they want to borrow some of our code, but are stuck with code
> which is GPLed (you can't mix MPLed code in with GPLed code because of the
> restrictive nature of the GPL).

So why not use LGPL?  IOW, why use MPL instead of LGPL?

Regards,
Brad


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alex Holden
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:02:43 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.