nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000
Message-Id: <E11YETz-00086h-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> >people will be able to hide drivers from us, as I think this has the 
> >potential to seriously injure Micro*'s open-source value. 
> 
> So has the lack of support for on devices where specs simply aren't openly
> available.

In the longer term XFree86 has gained by the fact vendors wont ship binary
only kit. Its now at the point that 'Linux' is a question big vendors ask
and that 'no' costs you bulk sales


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:22:47 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.