nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: "Bradley D. LaRonde" ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000
Message-Id: <035b01bf0ea5$db50edd0$b8119526@ltc.com>

----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
To: Vidar Hokstad ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.#### ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, October 04, 1999 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows


> > >people will be able to hide drivers from us, as I think this has the
> > >potential to seriously injure Micro*'s open-source value.
> >
> > So has the lack of support for on devices where specs simply aren't
openly
> > available.
>
> In the longer term XFree86 has gained by the fact vendors wont ship binary
> only kit. Its now at the point that 'Linux' is a question big vendors ask
> and that 'no' costs you bulk sales

I don't understand.  What do you mean?

Regards,
Brad


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Bradley D. LaRonde
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 20:27:01 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.