nanogui: running nano-x


Previous by date: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr

Subject: Re: [nanogui] running nano-x
From: Hinko Kocevar ####@####.####
Date: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100
Message-Id: <410A9FF3.7070509@iskramedical.si>

Greg Haerr wrote:

> Try printf()ing the values of the 3 fds that are passed, it may be
> that the mousefd or keyfd are negative...

mouse_fd is -2 if print()ed in GsInitialise() - result of NUL_Open(). 
Same goes for keyb_fd which is -2 also for the same reason.

In GsSelect() those fds don't get in fd_set, since they are not >= 0. 
un_sock takes up fb nr. 3. These are print()outs of fds in fd_Set just 
before call to select() is made:

maxfd = setsize+1;
for(i=0; i<=maxfd; i++)
           printf("%d\t%d\n", i, FD_ISSET(i,&rfds));

FD     val
0	0
1       0
2       0
3       1
4       0



-- 
hinko <dot> kocevar <at> iskramedical <dot> si
Hinko Kocevar, developer
Iskra Medical d.o.o., Stegne 23, 1k LJ, SLO-EU

	"Aì rén"	|	[Analects XII:22]

Previous by date: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Next by date: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Previous in thread: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr
Next in thread: 30 Jul 2004 20:22:31 +0100 Re: running nano-x, Greg Haerr


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.