nanogui: Re: running nano-x - SOLVED
Subject:
RE: [nanogui] Re: running nano-x - SOLVED
From:
Keith Williams ####@####.####
Date:
3 Aug 2004 00:04:39 +0100
Message-Id: <AB995F37CD50D311B6E70090276511D1ECE2C2@NTSERVER>
I think you may be missing one critical piece. He said that he compiled the
kernel with 2.95.3 and nano-X with 3.3.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Hinko Kocevar ####@####.####
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 6:20 AM
To: Greg Haerr
Cc: ####@####.####
Subject: Re: [nanogui] Re: running nano-x - SOLVED
Greg Haerr wrote:
>>>hmm... it could be an ARM-specific issue. I compile nano-X for my m68k
>>>system with a 3.3.4 prerelease.
>
>
> I knew it wasn't a problem with Microwindows select(), possibly
> a bug with other drivers though... After seeing this, I suspect
> your problem is the default structure size differs between compilers,
> and the structures passed to select() (timeout and fds) differ
> in size from application compiler to kernel compiler.
>
I compiled a toolchain with crosstool from dan kegel using these
versions of tools
BINUTILS_DIR=binutils-2.15
GCC_DIR=gcc-3.3.3
GLIBC_DIR=glibc-2.3.2
LINUX_DIR=linux-2.4.24
GLIBCTHREADS_FILENAME=glibc-linuxthreads-2.3.2
and it produces runnable kernel and nano-X server for arm platform.
regards,
h
--
hinko <dot> kocevar <at> iskramedical <dot> si
Hinko Kocevar, developer
Iskra Medical d.o.o., Stegne 23, 1k LJ, SLO-EU
"Aì rén" | [Analects XII:22]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
