nanogui: Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows)


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Louis P. Santillan

Subject: Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows)
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000
Message-Id: <E11YGu8-0008Lb-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> >As long as the API and/or messaging protocol are open spec, then anyone 
> >can write their own library.  X is an example, XFree uses opensource 
> >license, metrox and accelx used closed.  Same function, same result, but 
> >they had to write their own library. 

[Equally a server]

> Actually they wouldn't have had to if they didn't want to. The XFree license
> permits closed source use.

Indeed. And while LGPL might be better in some ways than the BSD license X
wouldnt be where it is today had it had a GPL library


Previous by date: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 4 Oct 1999 22:59:38 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Louis P. Santillan


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.