nanogui: Licensing summary


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwin dows), Jean-Eric Cuendet
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Bradley D. LaRonde

Subject: Re: Licensing summary
From: Ben Pfaff ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000
Message-Id: <87n1tyo7p8.fsf@pfaffben.user.msu.edu>

I've been following this discussion, sort of, and I'd just like to
comment that if you guys ever decide on a license, I'm willing to
relicense BOGL under it (as long as it's somewhat sensible, i.e., DFSG
compliant).  I don't know if you're going to use BOGL much anymore but
I'm willing to let you, if you want it.  Actually I don't care about
BOGL much anymore so maybe I'll just put it under the XFree86 license.

-- 
"Unix... is not so much a product
 as it is a painstakingly compiled oral history
 of the hacker subculture."
--Neal Stephenson

Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwin dows), Jean-Eric Cuendet
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 02:42:22 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Bradley D. LaRonde


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.