nanogui: A small request


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: At last - Microwindows/Nano-X Screenshots!!!, Araujo, Isaque G.
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Daniel R Risacher
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 A small request, Quinn D Weaver
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: A small request, Robert J.Lawrence

Subject: Re: A small request
From: "Vidar Hokstad" ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000
Message-Id: <19991005180453.20172.qmail@mail.relight.com>

On Tue, 5 Oct 1999 10:31:22 -0500 (EST) you wrote:
>It sounds like Vidar and co. are leaning heavily toward MPL, for a number 
>of well-considered reasons.  Guys, if you decide to go that route, would 
>you please dual-license the code under GPL?  I can see a number of 
>situations where free projects would be hurt by not being able to combine 
>GPL'ed code with nano* code. 

I agree with that, and I'd be happy to dual license the widget set and
any modifications I release.

Regards,
Vidar

Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: At last - Microwindows/Nano-X Screenshots!!!, Araujo, Isaque G.
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: Licensing summary, Daniel R Risacher
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 A small request, Quinn D Weaver
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 18:08:40 -0000 Re: A small request, Robert J.Lawrence


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.