nanogui: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR


Previous by date: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next by date: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat
Previous in thread: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat
Next in thread: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat

Subject: Re: [nanogui] #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.####
Date: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100
Message-Id: <200506020126.09320.neundorf@kde.org>

On Wednesday 01 June 2005 16:13, Alain Volmat wrote:
> Hi
...
> > What is actually the current state of cvs access ?
>
> The IP address problem ? It seems to have been fixed. I tried several time
> tonight and get everytime directed to the correct IP address.
> However no patch can be commited into the CVS until the version 0.91 get
> released.

Yes, this second part.
What's the plan for 0.91 ?
Merging all existing patches done by Greg ?
Merging patches is a lot of work, so I'm afraid this will still take some 
time.

How about giving more people commit access but only allowing commits after an 
ok the mailing list ? (and reverting every unreviewed patch)

This would be a chance to get microwindows development up on speed :-)

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: ####@####.####                - http://www.kde.org
      ####@####.####               - http://www.neundorf.net


Previous by date: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next by date: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat
Previous in thread: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat
Next in thread: 2 Jun 2005 00:26:17 +0100 Re: #if FOO vs. #ifdef BAR, Alain Volmat


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.