nanogui: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP


Previous by date: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next by date: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next in thread: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jordan Crouse

Subject: Re: [nanogui] Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100
Message-Id: <1ddc01c56bb8$8566d2b0$0300a8c0@RDP>

: What I propose is not to necessarily
: remove per-driver defines, but rather to have the driver table
: generated at compile time depending of what drivers did the user
: actually include in the build.

Is this in order to keep the executable file size down?

If so, far easier is just to do this the same way everything
else is done in Microwindows - set a config option,
and then the options are included using the existing
make system's method of creating a cc -D option
that is picked up using #if in the source code.  Why
do the drivers differently than everything else?

Regards,

Greg


Previous by date: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next by date: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jordan Crouse
Previous in thread: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jachym Holecek
Next in thread: 8 Jun 2005 01:22:13 +0100 Re: Pending patches/bug/requests ... list available on the FTP, Jordan Crouse


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.