| Previous by date: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Paul Bartholomew |
| Next by date: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Re: Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Jordan Crouse |
| Previous in thread: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Paul Bartholomew |
| Next in thread: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Re: Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Jordan Crouse |
On Thursday 30 June 2005 21:44, Paul Bartholomew wrote: ... > I suggest a global header file with 'generic' typedefs (like "uint16", > "uint32", etc), which can be customized based on your compiler. Then, > instead of using types like "unsigned long" and "unsigned int" throughout > the code (when the code really means: 32bits or 16 bits), use the new > "uint32/uint16" types. Sounds good, IMHO this would be the right approach. Bye Alex -- Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de Home: ####@####.#### - http://www.kde.org ####@####.#### - http://www.neundorf.net
| Previous by date: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Paul Bartholomew |
| Next by date: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Re: Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Jordan Crouse |
| Previous in thread: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Paul Bartholomew |
| Next in thread: | 30 Jun 2005 21:56:06 +0100 Re: Use of "unsigned long" for 32-bit quantities, Jordan Crouse |