nanogui: [patch] fix for zero width/height rectangles
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: [patch] fix for zero width/height rectangles
From:
"Sun Yingfeng" ####@####.####
Date:
16 Jul 2005 02:37:43 +0100
Message-Id: <000901c589a7$2aebfe20$0a01a8c0@sun>
I think the first case:
if (!w || !h)
return;
case reduce execution time than:
if ((w == 0) || (h == 0))
return;
Because judge "not equal" is need less time than judge "equal" in most CPU.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Bartholomew" ####@####.####
To: ####@####.#### ####@####.####
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 3:34 AM
Subject: RE: [nanogui] Re: [patch] fix for zero width/height rectangles
> >
> >+ if (!w || !h)
> >+ return;
> >
> >wouldn't this be more readable if it was (w == 0 || h == 0)?
>
> This certainly seems like a personal preference to me. I don't know if
> there are any 'coding standards' in the Microwindows/Nano-X project that
> would define the 'correct' way to represent this...
>
> I'd (personally) use either the "(!w || !h)" version, or:
>
>
> ((w == 0) || (h == 0))
>
> (extra parens)
>
> Of course, that's just my personal preference.
>
> - Paul
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>
