| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
using Nano-X with framebuffer.
From: Simon Wood ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jun 2000 08:47:42 -0000 Message-Id: <44632C76B97BD211AF6B00805FADCAB202D73629@exchange.saltaire.pace.co.uk> Busy weekend hacking away.... I managed to get framebuffers working on my machine and rebuilt microwin to drive them. I could happily run the microwin demos (mine, etc),but couldn't find a way to fire up Nano-X on a virtual terminal and then run a separate app (such as nclock) on that Nano-X display. I may be being really dumb, any suggestions? Simon Wood | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: using Nano-X with framebuffer.
From: Alex Holden ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jun 2000 09:52:47 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10006121042540.565-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Simon Wood wrote: > I could happily run the microwin demos (mine, etc),but couldn't find a way > to fire up Nano-X on a virtual terminal and then run a separate app (such as > nclock) on that Nano-X display. At the moment, either: bin/nano-X; sleep 1; bin/nclock or ./npanel.sh and use the menu You also may be able to start programs from nterm. Starting something from a seperate VT and switching back doesn't work well because the automatic repaint on VT switch seems to be broken. Soon, you'll be able to start programs from the root window menu of the window manager I've written. --------------- Linux- the choice of a GNU generation. -------------- : Alex Holden (M1CJD)- Caver, Programmer, Land Rover nut, Radio Ham : -------------------- http://www.linuxhacker.org/ -------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
RE: using Nano-X with framebuffer.
From: "Oh, Soonam" ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jun 2000 10:21:31 -0000 Message-Id: <AKEOLKMCIMEIFOEIHJCMEEMMCAAA.snoman@rednix.com> For running a separate app with Nano-X, you must compile kernel with Unix Domain Socket option (in Networking options). Becase "separate app" is client-server mode, nano-X server and app communicate via unix domain socket. -----Original Message----- From: Simon Wood ####@####.#### Sent: Monday, June 12, 2000 5:47 PM To: ####@####.#### Subject: using Nano-X with framebuffer. Busy weekend hacking away.... I managed to get framebuffers working on my machine and rebuilt microwin to drive them. I could happily run the microwin demos (mine, etc),but couldn't find a way to fire up Nano-X on a virtual terminal and then run a separate app (such as nclock) on that Nano-X display. I may be being really dumb, any suggestions? Simon Wood --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: using Nano-X with framebuffer.
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jun 2000 16:12:42 -0000 Message-Id: <02f401bfd489$18e174e0$15320cd0@gregh> : Starting something from a seperate VT and switching back doesn't work well : because the automatic repaint on VT switch seems to be broken. The VT switch for Nano-X works fine for me. Which demo are you running? If you're running the terminal emulator, it's broken because it doesn't handle expose events and doesn't keep track of it's screen contents; only it's background is erased... Regards, Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||