[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
using nano-X and flnx on ARM-linux
From: Ashim Prasad ####@####.#### Date: 30 Aug 2001 13:48:42 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0108301911190.867-100000@pcrnda225.sasken.com> Hi, We are using nano-X and flnx to develop applications on ARM-linux. Message below was posted in arm-linux mailing list. Can someone explain in more details about the problems mentioned below. Also are there patches available for these problems? Thanks in advance Ashim --------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 17:02:22 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux ####@####.#### To: Duncan Palmer ####@####.#### Cc: Roland Seuhs ####@####.#### ####@####.#### Subject: Re: Which graphics library/system to use? On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:42:05PM +0100, Duncan Palmer wrote: > We're using microwindows (www.microwindows.org) for our graphics > library, and the flnx (fltk ported to microwindows - www.fltk.org and > www.microwindows.org for the ported version) gui toolkit. There are currently a couple of things that I consider completely broken in microwindows: 1. It doesn't know how to setup grayscale displays. 2. It doesn't initialise the framebuffer correctly, and does a nasty VT switch hack to perform text-based updates on the display. I'm not currently interested in fixing these problems in microwindows; there's enough work going in with kernels to keep me fully occupied at the moment. I have produced code snippets to fix (2) in the past - search the list archive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] using nano-X and flnx on ARM-linux
From: Jordan Crouse ####@####.#### Date: 30 Aug 2001 13:59:10 -0000 Message-Id: <01083007581900.32375@cosmic> Did Russell King really say these things? > There are currently a couple of things that I consider completely broken > in microwindows: > > 1. It doesn't know how to setup grayscale displays. It can set up grayscale displays just fine. In fact, most of the devices that we use Microwindows on only have grayscale displays. > 2. It doesn't initialise the framebuffer correctly, and does a nasty > VT switch hack to perform text-based updates on the display. It does handle the framebuffer correctly, but they are right - we do a hack to handle VT switching. But this is mainly because nobody can decide how they want to handle the VT switching in the framebuffer drivers. I'm sure a decision will be made before 2.5, but until then, its everyone for themselves. IMHO we handle VT switching much better than X11 does. Jordan On Thursday 30 August 2001 07:48, Ashim Prasad mentioned: > Hi, > > We are using nano-X and flnx to develop applications on ARM-linux. > Message below was posted in arm-linux mailing list. Can someone > explain in more details about the problems mentioned below. Also > are there patches available for these problems? > > Thanks in advance > Ashim > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 17:02:22 +0100 > From: Russell King - ARM Linux ####@####.#### > To: Duncan Palmer ####@####.#### > Cc: Roland Seuhs ####@####.#### ####@####.#### > Subject: Re: Which graphics library/system to use? > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 04:42:05PM +0100, Duncan Palmer wrote: > > We're using microwindows (www.microwindows.org) for our graphics > > library, and the flnx (fltk ported to microwindows - www.fltk.org and > > www.microwindows.org for the ported version) gui toolkit. > > > I'm not currently interested in fixing these problems in microwindows; > there's enough work going in with kernels to keep me fully occupied at > the moment. > > I have produced code snippets to fix (2) in the past - search the list > archive. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] using nano-X and flnx on ARM-linux
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 31 Aug 2001 16:29:52 -0000 Message-Id: <0b0201c13236$f4827e20$3aba46a6@xmission.com> : 1. It doesn't know how to setup grayscale displays. Setting the GRAYSCALE option in the config file, which links in a grayscale palette and a 4bpp framebuffer driver, solves this problem. : 2. It doesn't initialise the framebuffer correctly, and does a nasty : VT switch hack to perform text-based updates on the display. Yes, Russell complained that the VT switch code is a total hack, and it is. It is very early contributed code and has never been rewritten. I have moved all of it into src/drivers/vtswitch.c, so at least it's contained. Russell suggested a method of fixing it, which I have archived. Certainly VTSWITCH=N in the config file leaves all of the code out. : I have produced code snippets to fix (2) in the past - search the list : archive. I don't have them - if you send them to me, I'll include them in the distribution. Regards, Greg : : : : : --------------------------------------------------------------------- : To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### : For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### : | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |