[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Using Gd* functions in NanoX app
From: Leonid Romanov ####@####.#### Date: 17 Jan 2002 16:07:18 -0000 Message-Id: <1011283433.22078.9.camel@mars> Hi! Is it safe (right) to use Gd* functions in NanoX application or should I stick to Gr* ones, introducing new Gr* functions in proper way if necessary? If so, then why? Thanks. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Using Gd* functions in NanoX app
From: Jordan Crouse ####@####.#### Date: 17 Jan 2002 16:27:05 -0000 Message-Id: <E16RFKn-0005mF-00@ns.censoft.com> If you recall from reading the architecture document, Microwindows is comprised of three layers: the drivers, the engine and the API(s). The Gd* functions that you discuss are part of the Microwindows engine, and are used by the two API layers to actually make things work. The Gr* functions are the actual nano-X API calls suitable for calling in client applications. You should only use Gr* functions in client applications (even if you link the client with the server). As you decide to add new client entry points, remember that small size is the cornerstone of Microwindows. We don't want to go around adding a whole lot of stuff just because we can. This especially goes for the server - since every line of code adds to the size of the binary. Its a little easier to get away with new client functions, because you have a little more control over wether or not they are included. So, here are a few handy questions to ask your self: 1. Can what I want be accomplished with several server calls? For example, there is an X function called XResizeAndMove(). Instead of implementing something similar in Nano-X, just use a GrResizeWindow() followed by a GrMoveWindow(). 2. Can what I want be accomplished with just a client call? If there is special conversion you want done, can it be accomplished with a client call instead of a server call? For example, see the functions in src/nanox/nxutil.c and src/nanox/nxdraw.c - These are functions that only use existing server functions. 3. If you feel it is absolutely necessary to implement a Gr* server call, then write up a quick description and send it to the list. We might be able to figure out a way to do it without adding new server calls, or, we may have already implemented it. Happy hacking, Jordan On Thursday 17 January 2002 09:03, Leonid Romanov mentioned: > Hi! > Is it safe (right) to use Gd* functions in NanoX application or should I > stick to Gr* ones, introducing new Gr* functions in proper way if > necessary? If so, then why? > > Thanks. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |