[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
mozilla X compatibility
From: News for William ####@####.#### Date: 24 Jun 2004 13:44:00 +0100 Message-Id: <4.3.2.20040624185933.00bcc3f8@203.81.64.31> Dear List, I'd like to clarify something... In the Changelog for Ver. 0.90, I notice Following is the detailed ChangeLog: Version 0.90 - 30 May 2003 - ####@####.#### ***************** * remove scancode hack in ttyscan.c (loses mozilla X compatibility) ***************** * protect 0 width/height bitmaps in GdBitmap, drawbitmap (PCF fonts) Does it mean Version 0.90 is no longer compatible with Mozilla?? Being just a system integrator, sorry if my interpretation is very wrong and please help me understand more. Thanks. Best regards, William | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] mozilla X compatibility
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 28 Jun 2004 03:55:32 +0100 Message-Id: <07f601c45cba$082f3340$1f0e95db@gregdell> > * remove scancode hack in ttyscan.c (loses mozilla X compatibility) > Does it mean Version 0.90 is no longer compatible with Mozilla?? William, Yes, the special keys may be incompatible with mozilla at this point, I #ifdef 0 hacked out code that the Mozilla port required. That is: Mozilla for Nano-X still required X keysym values, not the actual scancode values. With NXLIB, however, I had to actually return correct scancode values in order to get regular applications to run for the keycode conversion. For the Mozilla port, the #ifdef can be removed, and things should still be OK, although ultimately this needs to be fixed in Mozilla. Regards, Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |