nanogui: Thread: [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT


[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]
Subject: [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.####
Date: 28 May 2005 09:17:57 +0100
Message-Id: <200505281017.52096.neundorf@kde.org>

Hi,

this tiny patch gets rid of the duplicated HAVEFLOAT in devpoly.c.
Is there any special reason why it was this way ?

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
Home: ####@####.####                - http://www.kde.org
      ####@####.####               - http://www.neundorf.net

[Content type text/x-diff not shown. Download]
Subject: Re: [nanogui] [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alain Volmat ####@####.####
Date: 28 May 2005 10:11:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20050528091135.GD28707@pop.mail.yahoo.com>

Hi (again),

you're right, that's weird. devarc.c is using HAVEFLOAT, there might
be no reason to define USE_FLOAT instead of directly use HAVEFLOAT.
However, I think your patch is reversed. Could you send the proper one ?

Alain

* Alexander Neundorf [Sat, 28 May 2005 at 10:17 +0200]
<quote>
> Hi,
> 
> this tiny patch gets rid of the duplicated HAVEFLOAT in devpoly.c.
> Is there any special reason why it was this way ?
> 
> Bye
> Alex
> -- 
> Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de
> Home: ####@####.####                - http://www.kde.org
>       ####@####.####               - http://www.neundorf.net


> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
</quote>

	

	
		
_____________________________________________________________________________ 
Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! 
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [nanogui] [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.####
Date: 28 May 2005 10:18:56 +0100
Message-Id: <200505281118.50618.neundorf@kde.org>

On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:11, Alain Volmat wrote:
> Hi (again),
>
> you're right, that's weird. devarc.c is using HAVEFLOAT, there might
> be no reason to define USE_FLOAT instead of directly use HAVEFLOAT.
> However, I think your patch is reversed. Could you send the proper one ?
>
> Alain

Sorry, here it comes...

Alex

[Content type text/x-diff not shown. Download]
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.