[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
[PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.#### Date: 28 May 2005 09:17:57 +0100 Message-Id: <200505281017.52096.neundorf@kde.org> Hi, this tiny patch gets rid of the duplicated HAVEFLOAT in devpoly.c. Is there any special reason why it was this way ? Bye Alex -- Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de Home: ####@####.#### - http://www.kde.org ####@####.#### - http://www.neundorf.net [Content type text/x-diff not shown. Download] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alain Volmat ####@####.#### Date: 28 May 2005 10:11:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20050528091135.GD28707@pop.mail.yahoo.com> Hi (again), you're right, that's weird. devarc.c is using HAVEFLOAT, there might be no reason to define USE_FLOAT instead of directly use HAVEFLOAT. However, I think your patch is reversed. Could you send the proper one ? Alain * Alexander Neundorf [Sat, 28 May 2005 at 10:17 +0200] <quote> > Hi, > > this tiny patch gets rid of the duplicated HAVEFLOAT in devpoly.c. > Is there any special reason why it was this way ? > > Bye > Alex > -- > Work: ####@####.#### - http://www.jenoptik-los.de > Home: ####@####.#### - http://www.kde.org > ####@####.#### - http://www.neundorf.net > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### > For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### </quote> _____________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] [PATCH] USE_FLOAT -> HAVEFLOAT
From: Alexander Neundorf ####@####.#### Date: 28 May 2005 10:18:56 +0100 Message-Id: <200505281118.50618.neundorf@kde.org> On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:11, Alain Volmat wrote: > Hi (again), > > you're right, that's weird. devarc.c is using HAVEFLOAT, there might > be no reason to define USE_FLOAT instead of directly use HAVEFLOAT. > However, I think your patch is reversed. Could you send the proper one ? > > Alain Sorry, here it comes... Alex [Content type text/x-diff not shown. Download] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |