[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Porting a nanogui application
From: tan yongzai ####@####.#### Date: 3 Jun 2006 23:15:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20060603221502.92943.qmail@web33111.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Hi, I would like to code a single gui application that can run on wince, window mobile and familiar linux (embedded linux). I know it sounds ambitious but is it possible for nanogui to do that? I have been searching for months on the approach to develop such an application but still can't arrive to any conclusion. I have tried to develop the nano-x application but have no idea how to port to device. Do I just copy the binaries over to the device? Finally, is nano-x better than microwin? Nano-X is a client-server implementation which seems more popular than microwin. Furthermore, there is fltk-nano-x which provides more API. Thank you for your advice. Kind Regards, YongZai __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Porting a nanogui application
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 5 Jun 2006 21:28:01 +0100 Message-Id: <022d01c688de$7bd483c0$0300a8c0@RDP> If you want to run the same application on wince, windows mobile, and linux, you'll need to use the win32 (microwin) api, which for the implemented subset is identical. The nano-X API isn't better or worse, just different. It uses a client-server implementation, which allows multiple processes to access graphics, while the win32 is limited to a single, linked-in application. Regards, Greg : I would like to code a single gui application that can run on wince, window mobile and familiar linux (embedded linux). I know it sounds ambitious but is it possible for nanogui to do that? : I have been searching for months on the approach to develop such an application but still can't arrive to any conclusion. I have tried to develop the nano-x application but have no idea how to port to device. Do I just copy the binaries over to the device? : Finally, is nano-x better than microwin? Nano-X is a client-server implementation which seems more popular than microwin. Furthermore, there is fltk-nano-x which provides more API. : Thank you for your advice. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |