nanogui: Thread: Porting a nanogui application


[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]
Subject: Porting a nanogui application
From: tan yongzai ####@####.####
Date: 3 Jun 2006 23:15:41 +0100
Message-Id: <20060603221502.92943.qmail@web33111.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Hi,
 
   I would like to code a single gui application that can run on wince, window mobile and  familiar linux (embedded linux). I know it sounds ambitious but is it possible for nanogui to do that?
   I have been searching for months on the approach to develop such an application but still can't arrive to any conclusion. I have tried to develop the nano-x application but have no idea how to port to device. Do I just copy the binaries over to the device?
   Finally, is nano-x better than microwin? Nano-X is a client-server implementation which seems more popular than microwin. Furthermore, there is fltk-nano-x which provides more API.
   Thank you for your advice.
 
 Kind Regards,
 YongZai
 
 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
Subject: Re: [nanogui] Porting a nanogui application
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.####
Date: 5 Jun 2006 21:28:01 +0100
Message-Id: <022d01c688de$7bd483c0$0300a8c0@RDP>

If you want to run the same application on wince, windows mobile,
and linux, you'll need to use the win32 (microwin) api, which
for the implemented subset is identical.

The nano-X API isn't better or worse, just different.  It uses a
client-server implementation, which allows multiple processes to
access graphics, while the win32 is limited to a single, linked-in
application.

Regards,

Greg



:    I would like to code a single gui application that can run on wince,
window mobile and  familiar linux (embedded linux). I know it sounds
ambitious but is it possible for nanogui to do that?
:    I have been searching for months on the approach to develop such an
application but still can't arrive to any conclusion. I have tried to
develop the nano-x application but have no idea how to port to device. Do I
just copy the binaries over to the device?
:    Finally, is nano-x better than microwin? Nano-X is a client-server
implementation which seems more popular than microwin. Furthermore, there is
fltk-nano-x which provides more API.
:    Thank you for your advice.

[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.