[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
nano-X is real X server?
From: "Sergey Kolosov" ####@####.#### Date: 11 Jul 2006 16:49:18 +0100 Message-Id: <d39e2e70607110849t404dd158m1941c8a146dfd505@mail.gmail.com> Hello. Nano-X is real X server(support X11 protocol) or not? Otherwise can I remotely run with Nano-X standard X applications? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.#### Date: 11 Jul 2006 18:15:27 +0100 Message-Id: <20060711171523.GP18581@mordor.unix.fryenet> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:49:15PM +0400, Sergey Kolosov wrote: > Nano-X is real X server(support X11 protocol) or not? Otherwise can I > remotely run with Nano-X standard X applications? no, but you can recompile X programs with the XtoNX.h header wrapper, and get quite a few X programs running with nano-X. -- Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.#### | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 11 Jul 2006 22:43:30 +0100 Message-Id: <07e101c6a533$08cb3c90$2f01a8c0@HaydenLake> : no, but you can recompile X programs with the XtoNX.h header wrapper, : and get quite a few X programs running with nano-X. The XtoNX.h wrapper is very obsolete. Use the NXLIB X11 to nano-X conversion library, it works well enough to run most X11 program binaries, no need for re-compilation. NXLIB interprets the X11 API calls, and rewrites them towards the nano-X server. Regards, Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jul 2006 01:12:41 +0100 Message-Id: <20060712001233.GT18581@mordor.unix.fryenet> On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 02:43:16PM -0700, Greg Haerr wrote: > > no, but you can recompile X programs with the XtoNX.h header > > wrapper, and get quite a few X programs running with nano-X. > > The XtoNX.h wrapper is very obsolete. if that's the case, shouldn't it be dropped from the repository? -- Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | ####@####.#### | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [nanogui] Re: nano-X is real X server?
From: "Greg Haerr" ####@####.#### Date: 12 Jul 2006 04:09:14 +0100 Message-Id: <096e01c6a560$77f842c0$2f01a8c0@HaydenLake> : > The XtoNX.h wrapper is very obsolete. : : if that's the case, shouldn't it be dropped from the repository? Yeah, probably, along with a number of other things. It should probably just be made a reference file in the NXLIB project, since there's still some utility for educating folks about X11 and Nano-X compatibility by reading a header file. Regards, Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |