nanogui: Thread: benchmark for nano-X ?

Subject: benchmark for nano-X ?
From: Steven Scholz ####@####.####
Date: 27 Jul 2007 12:42:14 +0100
Message-Id: <46A9DA0D.6090907@imc-berlin.de>

Hi all,

I am trying to find out the performance impact for serveral config options
like LINK_APP_INTO_SERVER, HAVE_SHAREDMEM_SUPPORT, HAVE_FILEIO etc. using
the X11 API and FLTK.

And maybe even compare nano-X vs. Xorg server.

Is there a simple benchmark programm out there?

Thanks!

-- 
Steven

Subject: Re: benchmark for nano-X ?
From: "Aaron J. Grier" ####@####.####
Date: 30 Jul 2007 18:30:31 +0100
Message-Id: <20070730173026.GL22036@mordor.unix.fryenet>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 01:42:05PM +0200, Steven Scholz wrote:
> I am trying to find out the performance impact for serveral config
> options like LINK_APP_INTO_SERVER, HAVE_SHAREDMEM_SUPPORT, HAVE_FILEIO
> etc. using the X11 API and FLTK.
> 
> And maybe even compare nano-X vs. Xorg server.
> 
> Is there a simple benchmark programm out there?

x11perf ?

-- 
  Aaron J. Grier  |   Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR   |  ####@####.####