plustek: Progress on Test failure


Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 plustek 9636T, Ernie Schroder
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 Re: `MODEL_GEN_CPV2' undeclared, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 Progress on Test failure, MRZ
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Progress on Test failure
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.####
Date: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000
Message-Id: <01110311504301.00701@ruebennase>

Marc,

no progress so far, as I'm currently working on the USB support.
As there are currently more and more problems with the parport
devices, I plan ASAP to review the driver, but I'm really short
of time...

If you'd like to pin down the problem - go ahead, any input is welcome

Gerhard

On Friday,  2. November 2001 18:03, MRZ wrote:
> Hi again.
> Last I submitted to the list, I'd forwarded the debug output which
> "described" my OP 9636T's failure during a "scanimage -T". As a reminder,
> it was a segfault immediately prior to completion of *whatever* is done by
> " - T".
>
> I was wondering if any progress had been made to identify why this occurs.
> I'd also like to "re-volunteer" for any activities that might be necessary
> to squash this problem in the code.
>
>
> Regards,
> Marc.
>

Previous by date: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 plustek 9636T, Ernie Schroder
Next by date: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 Re: `MODEL_GEN_CPV2' undeclared, Jaeger, Gerhard
Previous in thread: 3 Nov 2001 10:54:40 -0000 Progress on Test failure, MRZ
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.