plustek: Thread: OpticPro 9636P, ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021)


[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]
Subject: OpticPro 9636P, ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021)
From: ####@####.####
Date: 23 Apr 2002 19:34:13 -0000
Message-Id: <18801.1019589938@www19.gmx.net>

Hi,

scanimage -L
shows me
ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021).
What does this mean?

I have an OpticPro 9636P. SUSE 7.3, SANE 1.0.5, plustek-sane-0_40_17.
The parport is set to EPP.

Many thanks for answers,
Ulrich Moehrke

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net

Subject: Re: OpticPro 9636P, ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021)
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.####
Date: 2 May 2002 06:20:59 -0000
Message-Id: <1739oz-1cKvQmC@fmrl07.sul.t-online.com>

Hi,

the error code -9021 means, that there is an version
conflict between the backend and the kernel-module.
Please refer to the table on the web-site to select
the correct version for you SANE installation or patch
your current SANE sources...
It has nothing to do with the parport settings.

Gerhard

On Tuesday, 23. April 2002 21:25, ####@####.#### wrote:
> Hi,
>
> scanimage -L
> shows me
> ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021).
> What does this mean?
>
> I have an OpticPro 9636P. SUSE 7.3, SANE 1.0.5, plustek-sane-0_40_17.
> The parport is set to EPP.
>
> Many thanks for answers,
> Ulrich Moehrke
Subject: Re: OpticPro 9636P, ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021)
From: ####@####.####
Date: 21 May 2002 21:17:34 -0000
Message-Id: <14854.1022015244@www13.gmx.net>

Hi Gerhard,

thank you for your answer, but the versions shouldn't be the reason.
I tried the versions SANE 1.0.5, plustek-sane-0_40_17 and now SANE 1.0.7,
plustek-sane-0_41_5 with the same result.


I have a little bit more information. DMESG shows:

.....
parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(38)
parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(38)
parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(38)
parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(38)
lp0: using parport0 (polling).
lp0: compatibility mode
CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
PPP generic driver version 2.4.1
PPP BSD Compression module registered
PPP Deflate Compression module registered
pt_drv : driver version 0.41-6
pt_drv0: 600P/6000P found on port 0x0378
pt_drv0: Lamp-Timer set to 180 seconds.
pt_drv0: WarmUp period set to 15 seconds.
pt_drv0: Lamp untouched on driver unload.

It seams that the driver thinks there is a 600P/6000P instead of a 9636P.



Thank you for hints. What can I do to find out more to solve the problem?

Ulrich


> Hi,
> 
> the error code -9021 means, that there is an version
> conflict between the backend and the kernel-module.
> Please refer to the table on the web-site to select
> the correct version for you SANE installation or patch
> your current SANE sources...
> It has nothing to do with the parport settings.
> 
> Gerhard
> 
> On Tuesday, 23. April 2002 21:25, ####@####.#### wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > scanimage -L
> > shows me
> > ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021).
> > What does this mean?
> >
> > I have an OpticPro 9636P. SUSE 7.3, SANE 1.0.5, plustek-sane-0_40_17.
> > The parport is set to EPP.
> >
> > Many thanks for answers,
> > Ulrich Moehrke
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
> 

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net

Subject: Re: OpticPro 9636P, ioctl PT_DRV_OPEN_DEVICE failed(-9021)
From: "Jaeger, Gerhard" ####@####.####
Date: 22 May 2002 18:39:27 -0000
Message-Id: <17AarV-05IbRZC@fmrl09.sul.t-online.com>

Hi Ulrich,

from a technical point of view, the OP600 and a 9636P
should be identical...
First of all, enable the debug messages in the kernel-module:
make clean
make DEBUG=y all

then install it and do a make load. after this step, 
get the output of dmesg and send it to me...

Enable also the debug output of the SANE stuff:
export SANE_DEBUG_PLUSTEK=12

then simply call
scanimage -L

also send this ouput to me...

Then it should be possible to track down the problem
Gerhard

On Tuesday, 21. May 2002 23:07, ####@####.#### wrote:
> Hi Gerhard,
>
> thank you for your answer, but the versions shouldn't be the reason.
> I tried the versions SANE 1.0.5, plustek-sane-0_40_17 and now SANE 1.0.7,
> plustek-sane-0_41_5 with the same result.
>
>
> I have a little bit more information. DMESG shows:
>
> .....
> parport0: PC-style at 0x378 [PCSPP,TRISTATE,EPP]
> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(38)
> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(38)
> parport0: cpp_daisy: aa5500ff(38)
> parport0: assign_addrs: aa5500ff(38)
> lp0: using parport0 (polling).
> lp0: compatibility mode
> CSLIP: code copyright 1989 Regents of the University of California
> PPP generic driver version 2.4.1
> PPP BSD Compression module registered
> PPP Deflate Compression module registered
> pt_drv : driver version 0.41-6
> pt_drv0: 600P/6000P found on port 0x0378
> pt_drv0: Lamp-Timer set to 180 seconds.
> pt_drv0: WarmUp period set to 15 seconds.
> pt_drv0: Lamp untouched on driver unload.
>
> It seams that the driver thinks there is a 600P/6000P instead of a 9636P.
>
>
>
> Thank you for hints. What can I do to find out more to solve the problem?
>
> Ulrich
>
>
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>]


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.