[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Shading problem on HP2100C and Negative scanning on EPSON
From: Gerhard Jaeger ####@####.#### Date: 14 Oct 2002 08:41:21 -0000 Message-Id: <200210141039.25371.gerhard@gjaeger.de> Hi there, yesterday I found some problems in the shading correction that affects esp. LM9831 based devices like the U12, Bearpaw 1200 and HP2100C. Based on version 0.44-7 I fixed that and named it 0.44-8 (to be found in the test section at www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html). There also seem to be some problems during negative scanning on the EPSON Photo devices. This might be the same problem. But I also detected here some problems in finding the correct gain values. This is currently als a problem for my Plustek negative scans. Till can you please try version 0.44-8 with and without calibration! (option skipCalibration). To fix the red channel problem, you might also use option red_gain and set this value manually to a reasonably good value... Thanks guys for testing Gerhard | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Shading problem on HP2100C and Negative scanning on EPSON
From: Till Kamppeter ####@####.#### Date: 14 Oct 2002 14:52:28 -0000 Message-Id: <3DAAD945.90702@gmx.net> I have tested the new version now. Colors of scanned negatives look better, at least in the preview, but when I do a real scan without changing any parameters before, the colors look completely different. I have made a screenshot of this: http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/xsane-neg-Eps1260.png This is done with "Negative" as scan source and "Standard Negative" as source type. Best colors (more or less correct, especially gray comes out gray) I get with "Full Range" and "Invert Colors" button (second from the lft in main window, directly under the adjustment sliders, or press Shift+N). An there are also still these vertical stripes, which appear only for negative scans and were not there in 0.44-6. Now I have done this again with "option skipCalibration 1", but this does not work at all. I have started with "Negative", "Full Range" and the color inversion button not pressed. I didn't fiddle with any adjustments an have taken a preview scan and then this screenshot: http://www.linuxprinting.org/till/tmp/xsane-neg-Eps1260-skipcalibration.png Now I have clicked (again without fiddling at any option) the "Start" button for the real scan. I have a resolution of 600 dpi set (This I had also before and there it worked). After around two seconds I get an error message: "Failed to start scanner: Out of memory". I click "Close" in the error message window and click "Start" in the main window again. The scan head moves 5 cm and xsane crashes with the message "Floating point exception (core dumped)". The debug log of this xsane session is attached. There appeared no "core" file. Till Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > Hi there, > > yesterday I found some problems in the shading correction that > affects esp. LM9831 based devices like the U12, Bearpaw 1200 and > HP2100C. > Based on version 0.44-7 I fixed that and named it 0.44-8 (to be > found in the test section at www.gjaeger.de/scanner/plustek.html). > > There also seem to be some problems during negative scanning > on the EPSON Photo devices. This might be the same problem. > But I also detected here some problems in finding the correct gain values. > This is currently als a problem for my Plustek negative scans. > Till can you please try version 0.44-8 with and without calibration! > (option skipCalibration). To fix the red channel problem, you might > also use option red_gain and set this value manually to a reasonably > good value... > > Thanks guys for testing > Gerhard > > [Content type application/gzip not shown. Download] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |