primax: Colorado 9600 USB


Previous by date: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Next by date: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Previous in thread: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Next in thread: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi

Subject: Re: Colorado 9600 USB
From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
Date: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000
Message-Id: <XFMail.000207183321.chr.ordig@gmx.net>

On 07-Feb-00 Beldaz Jalfrezi wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 05:04:17PM +0100, Christian Ordig wrote:
>> 
>> well the only USB scanner we got is the USB 19200... 
>> we just have to understand and  make a parallel port driver 
>> for the E3 Chipset,
>> then we have to find out where low level protocol ends and where 
>> the higher level
>> protocol starts...
> 
> Sounds simple ;-)
well.... not really...
 
> Is the E3 chipset generic for most of the primax scanners? I don't
> know what differences between the 19200 and 9600 are, and netscape
Well... the E3 seems to be used in most of the newer Primax scanners... combined
with different CCDs with different resolutions...

> crashes when I go to www.primax.nl to find out :-(
Wow!

> If most of the control commands are essentially high-level (and 
> remember, I know nothing about drivers so I may well not be talking
> sense) then presumably the drivers have a lot in common. It would
> seem like re-inventing the wheel to produce a new driver for each
> scanner.
right... but from reverse engeneering and tracing the parallel port we cannot really
find the border between low-level and high-level...

> What help is Primax giving? I guess they aren't providing the source
> code for their drivers - although I don't see why not.
Well... we signed an NDA... got some bad docs and some scanners and were
left alone from then on again...
> It sounds like
> there's more to what you are trying to do than just adapting the 
> windows drivers to a linux system.
> I see you already have a basic driver for some parallel scanners 
> working. How (in very basic terms) does it work? Does it give
> basic configuration commands, tell the scanner to scan, then
> interpret the output the scanner produces? Or is there more to it,
> with some degree of cross-communication throughout the whole
> process between the scanner and the computer?
Well... it really works! And that really good... but only for the Primax Colorado Direct D300
and compatibles... not for scanners with the E1/E3 Chipset...
We're going to bring it to Beta-Test next weeks and release 1.0 then...

> Sorry, lots of questions, but I'm very curious.
asking questions doesn't cost anything... only when tey're FAQs... so please read them before 
asking anything... 

Thanks
 

---
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
   __   _                   |                                                 
  / /  (_)__  __ ____  __   | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and      
 / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to waiting  
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.           

Previous by date: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Next by date: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Previous in thread: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi
Next in thread: 7 Feb 2000 17:39:58 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Beldaz Jalfrezi


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.