primax: Colorado 9600 USB


Previous by date: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Jochem Vaartjes
Next by date: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Jochem Vaartjes
Next in thread: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Christian Ordig

Subject: Re: Colorado 9600 USB
From: Beldaz Jalfrezi ####@####.####
Date: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000
Message-Id: <20000208094744.B32192@thelonious.new.ox.ac.uk>

On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 08:29:28AM +0100, Jochem Vaartjes wrote:

> > How about this Jochem Vaartjes guy from Primax who posted last
> > month?
> > Is he for real? - in which case could he not just provide the
> > source from the windows drivers?
> I'm for real, that's for sure. I'm trying to get the documents 
> from primax as we speak.
> But primax rufuses to give out the source for the windows drivers.

Why is this? I'm not trying to be obtuse, but I don't get this 
mentality. If primax are happy to supply scanners and documentation
to this project, why do they insist on making people like Christian
jump through hoops by forcing them to do things the hard way?
In simple economic terms they only help themselves by ensuring
linux drivers are available for their products as soon as possibel, 
since they enlarge their own potential market.

Is there any way to encourage Primax to be a bit more helpful?
Maybe a post to Slashdot urging everyone with a primax device
to contact them?

What do you think, Jochem?

Bryn.

Previous by date: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Jochem Vaartjes
Next by date: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Christian Ordig
Previous in thread: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Jochem Vaartjes
Next in thread: 8 Feb 2000 09:58:19 -0000 Re: Colorado 9600 USB, Christian Ordig


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.