primax: Thread: how to access functionality ( was Re: Colorado 9600 USB )

Christian Ordig wrote:
> 
> On 08-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
> > Also on a more general point, do you think that it is time to put the
> > code
> > onto a CVS server ( e.g. sourceforge.org ) ?
> public CVS isn't available yet... but we're currently setting things up on sourceforge...
Great.

> > Also what way do you see the code working when we get to version 1.0 ?
> > i.e. as a part of SANE, a demon on it's own, or .... ?
> > I am interested as I am adding a KDE interface.
> 1.0 will still be a command line tool... then we'll make it a SANE backend... skelleton
> seems to be there...
Is anyone working on the SANE stuff at the moment ?

> 
> > Is this interesting for anyone ?
> well... will become uniteresting when the SANE stuff is finally there... ;-)

I guess as much :-) but thought that we may get some more interest from
people
if it was available.

CP

On 09-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
> Christian Ordig wrote:
>> 
>> On 08-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
>> > Also on a more general point, do you think that it is time to put the
>> > code
>> > onto a CVS server ( e.g. sourceforge.org ) ?
>> public CVS isn't available yet... but we're currently setting things up on sourceforge...
> Great.
> 
>> > Also what way do you see the code working when we get to version 1.0 ?
>> > i.e. as a part of SANE, a demon on it's own, or .... ?
>> > I am interested as I am adding a KDE interface.
>> 1.0 will still be a command line tool... then we'll make it a SANE backend... skelleton
>> seems to be there...
> Is anyone working on the SANE stuff at the moment ?
> 
well... Marco has a skeletton of the backend - as he told me... just the structs and so on... but no 
scanning functionality, yet...

>> 
>> > Is this interesting for anyone ?
>> well... will become uniteresting when the SANE stuff is finally there... ;-)
> 
> I guess as much :-) but thought that we may get some more interest from
> people
> if it was available.
Well... maybe a KDE interface is less worth than a GIMP Interface...
But remember: there's already a TCL interface... I think there's no real need for another
none SANE GUI, if you really want to do it... simply feel free... above is only my oppinion...


---
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
   __   _                   |                                                 
  / /  (_)__  __ ____  __   | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and      
 / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to waiting  
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.           

----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
To: C Hennessy ####@####.####
Cc: ####@####.####
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:37 PM
Subject: RE: how to access functionality ( was Re: Colorado 9600 USB )


>
> On 09-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
> > Christian Ordig wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
> >> > Also on a more general point, do you think that it is time to put the
> >> > code
> >> > onto a CVS server ( e.g. sourceforge.org ) ?
> >> public CVS isn't available yet... but we're currently setting things up
on sourceforge...
> > Great.
> >
> >> > Also what way do you see the code working when we get to version 1.0
?
> >> > i.e. as a part of SANE, a demon on it's own, or .... ?
> >> > I am interested as I am adding a KDE interface.
> >> 1.0 will still be a command line tool... then we'll make it a SANE
backend... skelleton
> >> seems to be there...
> > Is anyone working on the SANE stuff at the moment ?
> >
> well... Marco has a skeletton of the backend - as he told me... just the
structs and so on... but no
> scanning functionality, yet...
>
> >>
> >> > Is this interesting for anyone ?
> >> well... will become uniteresting when the SANE stuff is finally
there... ;-)
> >
> > I guess as much :-) but thought that we may get some more interest from
> > people
> > if it was available.
> Well... maybe a KDE interface is less worth than a GIMP Interface...
> But remember: there's already a TCL interface... I think there's no real
need for another
> none SANE GUI, if you really want to do it... simply feel free... above is
only my oppinion...
>
>
> ---
> Christian Ordig             | Homepage:
http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
> Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig
####@####.####
>    __   _                   |
>   / /  (_)__  __ ____  __   | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and
>  / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to
waiting
> /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>

Please stop sending Colorado messages to this address. I no longer have the
scanner and therefore have no further interest.
>

On 10-Feb-00 David Edwards wrote:
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
> To: C Hennessy ####@####.####
> Cc: ####@####.####
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2000 3:37 PM
> Subject: RE: how to access functionality ( was Re: Colorado 9600 USB )
> 
> 
>>
>> On 09-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
>> > Christian Ordig wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 08-Feb-00 C Hennessy wrote:
>> >> > Also on a more general point, do you think that it is time to put the
>> >> > code
>> >> > onto a CVS server ( e.g. sourceforge.org ) ?
>> >> public CVS isn't available yet... but we're currently setting things up
> on sourceforge...
>> > Great.
>> >
>> >> > Also what way do you see the code working when we get to version 1.0
> ?
>> >> > i.e. as a part of SANE, a demon on it's own, or .... ?
>> >> > I am interested as I am adding a KDE interface.
>> >> 1.0 will still be a command line tool... then we'll make it a SANE
> backend... skelleton
>> >> seems to be there...
>> > Is anyone working on the SANE stuff at the moment ?
>> >
>> well... Marco has a skeletton of the backend - as he told me... just the
> structs and so on... but no
>> scanning functionality, yet...
>>
>> >>
>> >> > Is this interesting for anyone ?
>> >> well... will become uniteresting when the SANE stuff is finally
> there... ;-)
>> >
>> > I guess as much :-) but thought that we may get some more interest from
>> > people
>> > if it was available.
>> Well... maybe a KDE interface is less worth than a GIMP Interface...
>> But remember: there's already a TCL interface... I think there's no real
> need for another
>> none SANE GUI, if you really want to do it... simply feel free... above is
> only my oppinion...
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Christian Ordig             | Homepage:
> http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/
>> Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig
> ####@####.####
>>    __   _                   |
>>   / /  (_)__  __ ____  __   | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and
>>  / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to
> waiting
>> /____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####
>> For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.####
>>
> 
> Please stop sending Colorado messages to this address. I no longer have the
> scanner and therefore have no further interest.

Simply unsubscribe from the mailing list...!

To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.####

cu.


---
Christian Ordig             | Homepage: http://thor.prohosting.com/~chrordig/ 
Germany                     |    eMail: Christian Ordig ####@####.####
   __   _                   |                                                 
  / /  (_)__  __ ____  __   | Why Linux? Because it is free, stable, and      
 / /__/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /   | bugs can be fixed in source opposed to waiting  
/____/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\   | for a stable WinTendo from Micro$oft.