teatotal: tea-totaler and Solaris?


Previous by date: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 tea-totaler and Solaris?, Terry Gliedt
Next by date: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 Linuxhacker.org has been upgraded, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 tea-totaler and Solaris?, Terry Gliedt
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: tea-totaler and Solaris?
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101091953330.618-100000@hyperspace.linuxhacker.org>

On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Terry Gliedt wrote:
> Have you tried to make this on a Solaris system? What ARCH
> value in config.inc did you use?  TIA

No, you'll need to write a new ARCH section for it. Take a look around the
header files to try to find the definition for byte order and unsigned 32
bit, signed 32 bit, unsigned 16 bit, and unsigned 8 bit types, then write 
a new section in arch.h similar to the LINUX and OPENBSD ones which
defines BYTE_ORDER, u32, s32, u16 and u8. You'll also probably need to add
something to Makefile which sets the location of your manual pages and the
secure random device. If you don't have a secure random device, simply 
don't define RANDOM_DEVICE, and the internal secure random number
generator will be built instead.

BTW, it's TEA Total, not tea-totaler.

-- 
------- Alex Holden -------
http://www.linuxhacker.org/
 http://www.robogeeks.org/


Previous by date: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 tea-totaler and Solaris?, Terry Gliedt
Next by date: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 Linuxhacker.org has been upgraded, Alex Holden
Previous in thread: 9 Jan 2001 20:03:31 -0000 tea-totaler and Solaris?, Terry Gliedt
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.