gnupic: gpsim-0.19.1


Previous by date: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: gpsim-0.19.1, Matthew Bowles
Next by date: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: newbie to Linux pic have questions, w. v. ooijen / f. hanneman
Previous in thread: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: gpsim-0.19.1, Matthew Bowles
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: gpsim-0.19.1
From: Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005020543550.32742-100000@tempest2.blackhat.net>


On Tue, 2 May 2000, Matthew Bowles wrote:

> 
> > Matt Bowles found a bug that was causing TMR0 to fail. You can either get the
> > whole tar ball off my web page or from cvs.
> > 
> 
> Works beeyudifull...

Good! 

Did you take the 0.19.1 tar ball as is or did you have to patch 0.19.0 ?

The reason I ask is that I know that 'make' is broken in CVS and on my computer,
but I may've squeezed out the 19.1 tar ball before introducing this bug.

Mainly for Ralf:

I just have added cmd_bus.cc and cmd_module.cc to CVS. So CVS should be complete
again. The 'make' bug I refer to above can be circumvented by changing


#include <gpsim/modules.h>

to 

#include "../src/modules.h"

in the include file:

modules/binary_indicator.h

Once a 'make install' is performed, binary_indicator.h can be changed back.
`make install' now installs the include files that are in src/ . Once the
include files make it to the install directory, then the new modules library
will build just fine

I'll be addressing this in the next few days...

Scott


Previous by date: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: gpsim-0.19.1, Matthew Bowles
Next by date: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: newbie to Linux pic have questions, w. v. ooijen / f. hanneman
Previous in thread: 2 May 2000 10:58:38 -0000 Re: gpsim-0.19.1, Matthew Bowles
Next in thread:


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.