gnupic: SDCC pic port status
Subject:
Re: SDCC pic port status
From:
Scott Dattalo ####@####.####
Date:
2 Dec 2000 06:32:39 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012020034370.13972-100000@tempest2.blackhat.net>
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> If anyone has access to a "real" C compiler, I'd be interested to see how this
> compares.
I guess you can call C2C a real compiler. It costs money right?
The SDCC port generates 179 instructions for the example I previously posted
while C2C generates 241. That's 35% more! Maybe there's an optimization setting
I'm missing in c2c?
Scott
