gnupic: SDCC pic port status


Previous by date: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo

Subject: Re: SDCC pic port status
From: Matt ####@####.####
Date: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000
Message-Id: <3A2ACD41.163FDE30@dsp.com.au>

Scott Dattalo wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, Scott Dattalo wrote:
> 
> > If anyone has access to a "real" C compiler, I'd be interested to see how this
> > compares.
> 
Hitech PICC produces 247 bytes without optimisations, and 173 with -O
-Zg9 options..
(actually surprisingly I found it was 172 without the -Zg9 optimising
option)

the asm has been sent to Scott.

Matt
mail from: dsp systems

Previous by date: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Next by date: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Previous in thread: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo
Next in thread: 3 Dec 2000 22:43:21 -0000 Re: SDCC pic port status, Scott Dattalo


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.