| Previous by date: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, Marko Kohtala |
| Next by date: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, captain.deadly.gmail.com |
| Previous in thread: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, Marko Kohtala |
| Next in thread: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, captain.deadly.gmail.com |
Please answer Marko's questions. ####@####.#### wrote: > I've got to move to the PIC18 chips .. > The last time I checked SDCC didn't support PIC18 Note that PIC16 and PIC18 are very very similar. They're basically the same architecture, except that PIC18 can have a call stack, to make code generation in C compilers easier. //Peter
| Previous by date: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, Marko Kohtala |
| Next by date: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, captain.deadly.gmail.com |
| Previous in thread: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, Marko Kohtala |
| Next in thread: | 14 Feb 2011 20:57:16 -0000 Re: Moving from PIC16 to PIC18 Adding chip to gpasm and picp, captain.deadly.gmail.com |