| Previous by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
| Next by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com |
| Previous in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
| Next in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Rob Taylor |
> Not yet. TrollTech has decided to build their own, non-free, non-open
source
> framebuffer
> version of QT called Qt/Embedded. It has a similar feature set to
Microwindows,
> but isn't, aparently.
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
How hard would it be to port QT to nanox? Has someone looked into it?
Simon
| Previous by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
| Next by date: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com |
| Previous in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Greg Haerr |
| Next in thread: | 14 Apr 2000 04:05:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Rob Taylor |