nanogui: QT Port?


Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roman Pollak
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Agarwal
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roman Pollak

Subject: RE: QT Port?
From: "Rob Taylor" ####@####.####
Date: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000
Message-Id: <000601bfa5f4$dd8298b0$b400a8c0@eventhorizon>

>
> > Not yet.  TrollTech has decided to build their own, non-free, non-open
> source
> > framebuffer
> > version of QT called Qt/Embedded.  It has a similar feature set to
> Microwindows,
> > but isn't, aparently.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Greg
>
>     How hard would it be to port QT to nanox? Has someone looked into it?
>
>     Simon

Roberto Alsina and myself have been starting a bit of work on this, but
progess is slow (Roberto's 1st version got lost in HD crash..) If anyone
wants to help out any, feel free to get in contact...


Rob Taylor


Previous by date: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: A few process-related questions about uWin vs. nano-X, vidar.hokstad.com
Next by date: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roman Pollak
Previous in thread: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Agarwal
Next in thread: 14 Apr 2000 09:46:00 -0000 Re: QT Port?, Roman Pollak


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.