nanogui: State of the nanogui union?
Subject:
Re: State of the nanogui union?
From:
"Vidar Hokstad" ####@####.####
Date:
29 Sep 1999 11:47:51 -0000
Message-Id: <19990929114303.26595.qmail@mail.relight.com>
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 12:14:00 +0100 (BST) you wrote:
>> via some C macro hackery. Currently, the test program is about 30kb with
>> all the classes compiled in. It's also prepared for externalizing rendering
>> and layout into separate objects, making it instantly themable.
>
>Those are the sort of size numbers I hoped we could eventually aim at for
>basic widgets. That its so small now already is great.
It will be a bit bigger when we include some more support functions.
But on the other hand, I just checked, and compiled with -O2 and stripped,
the test program was only 21kb, and I'm sure the code can be optimized
further.
The 30kb included extensive debugging (the macro hackery mentioned above
includes a compile time option to add a printf with debug info for _every_
method call...)
Regards,
Vidar Hokstad
