nanogui: State of the nanogui union?


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: Pixmaps?, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad

Subject: Re: State of the nanogui union?
From: Alan Cox ####@####.####
Date: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000
Message-Id: <E11WHgQ-0001yn-00@the-village.bc.nu>

> via some C macro hackery. Currently, the test program is about 30kb with
> all the classes compiled in. It's also prepared for externalizing rendering
> and layout into separate objects, making it instantly themable.

Those are the sort of size numbers I hoped we could eventually aim at for
basic widgets. That its so small now already is great.

Alan


Previous by date: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: Pixmaps?, Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad
Previous in thread: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 29 Sep 1999 11:23:13 -0000 Re: State of the nanogui union?, Vidar Hokstad


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.