nanogui: Request for comments - Microwindows


Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwin dows), Jean-Eric Cuendet
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox

Subject: Re: Request for comments - Microwindows
From: Jakob Eriksson ####@####.####
Date: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.3.95.991005103438.1934A-100000@bilbo.mdh.se>

On Mon, 4 Oct 1999, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:

> However, it does appear to kill the static model, but ONLY FOR NON-FREE
> ROGRAMS.  Free programs could still use the static model just fine, and
> non-free programs could still use the client/server model, since the client
> side is LGPL.

But the static model is probably targeted the most at embedded projects.
These tend to be non-free, often for practical reasons.
I think it is better to get a shoe through the embedded door, rather than
not at all.

Just my SKR 0.05


Jakob




Previous by date: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwindows), Vidar Hokstad
Next by date: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Stupid licensing thread (Was: Request for comments - Microwin dows), Jean-Eric Cuendet
Previous in thread: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Vidar Hokstad
Next in thread: 5 Oct 1999 08:44:52 -0000 Re: Request for comments - Microwindows, Alan Cox


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.