teatotal: teatotal on Solaris 5.8


Previous by date: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Next by date: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 Re: teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Previous in thread: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Next in thread: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 Re: teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach

Subject: Re: teatotal on Solaris 5.8
From: Alex Holden ####@####.####
Date: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000
Message-Id: <3CF4C156.6020103@linuxhacker.org>

Steve M. Gehlbach wrote:
> I finally figured out the pointer alignment problem on Solaris.
> I managed to put an extra byte in the teapacket structure and force it to
> align.  The solution is a little crude but it works.  Also, I think there is

ARM had a similar (possibly the same) problem. Can you try the CVS 
snapshot and see if it fixes this problem for you?

> a bug in the getarg.c routine in that the trailing null is not copied for
> string arguments.  Original code seems to work on Linux but maybe the
> malloc() zeros the memory?? not sure.  Maybe strlen() is different.

Yes, that was another bug that I already fixed in the CVS.

The nightly CVS snapshots are available from here:
http://www.linuxhacker.org/pub/cvs-snapshots/tea-total/

-- 
------------ Alex Holden - http://www.linuxhacker.org ------------
If it doesn't work, you're not hitting it with a big enough hammer


Previous by date: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Next by date: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 Re: teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Previous in thread: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach
Next in thread: 29 May 2002 12:04:11 -0000 Re: teatotal on Solaris 5.8, Steve M. Gehlbach


Powered by ezmlm-browse 0.20.